<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GTD Times &#8211; Kluge and GTD</title>
	<atom:link href="http:///2008/05/29/gtd-times-kluge-and-gtd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gtdtimes.com/2008/05/29/gtd-times-kluge-and-gtd/</link>
	<description>The Hub for All Things GTD</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:45:53 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: owstarr</title>
		<link>http://www.gtdtimes.com/2008/05/29/gtd-times-kluge-and-gtd/comment-page-1/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>owstarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 08:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gtdtimes.com/2008/05/29/gtd-times-kluge-and-gtd/#comment-308</guid>
		<description>Dear PurpleSlog; you may be right but we&#039;re going with the title of the published work since that&#039;s the term the author has used and it&#039;s also the way his editors chose to accept the spelling.

This is not an oversight but an editorial decision based upon the need to agree with the title of a book under review.  In addition, a review of the web via a Google search turned up the following page in reference to the use of &quot;kluge&quot; vs. &quot;kludge&quot;:  http://catb.org/jargon/html/K/kluge.html

Thank you for reading and for commenting!

Oliver Starr, Editor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear PurpleSlog; you may be right but we&#8217;re going with the title of the published work since that&#8217;s the term the author has used and it&#8217;s also the way his editors chose to accept the spelling.</p>
<p>This is not an oversight but an editorial decision based upon the need to agree with the title of a book under review.  In addition, a review of the web via a Google search turned up the following page in reference to the use of &#8220;kluge&#8221; vs. &#8220;kludge&#8221;:  <a href="http://catb.org/jargon/html/K/kluge.html" rel="nofollow">http://catb.org/jargon/html/K/kluge.html</a></p>
<p>Thank you for reading and for commenting!</p>
<p>Oliver Starr, Editor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PurpleSlog</title>
		<link>http://www.gtdtimes.com/2008/05/29/gtd-times-kluge-and-gtd/comment-page-1/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>PurpleSlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 14:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gtdtimes.com/2008/05/29/gtd-times-kluge-and-gtd/#comment-305</guid>
		<description>The word is &quot;kludge&quot;, not &quot;kluge&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The word is &#8220;kludge&#8221;, not &#8220;kluge&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
